Skip to main content

Alan - First Week at UCSF


Hi Everyone!

After arriving in San Francisco last Sunday, I spent this past week settling into the downtown Berkeley apartment that I’ll be sharing with Rohit for the next couple of months, as well as learning my way around the Roy lab at UCSF.

First day at the lab was really exciting. Here are a couple pictures of the Mission Bay campus, which was completed just a few years ago. Everything is super new and modern, and there’s still construction for other buildings going on around the campus. Most of the people who work at the Mission Bay campus are either professional researchers or doctors/nurses for the nearby hospital. The graduate students take most of their classes at the original Parnassus campus (where Maya is).



I work in Byers Hall, which is connected to Genentech Hall and a short walk down the block from the shuttle stop. There are three other volunteers working for the Roy lab this summer – Kimmai, David, and Pujita, who are all undergrad college students. For the first couple of days Shuvo (my PI) was out traveling so I didn’t get to meet him until later in the week. I’ve been reporting to Charlie so far, who’s my supervisor.



The Roy lab is focused on developing artificial organ devices that can be implanted into patients’ bodies. Charlie explained that most of the UCSF labs conduct applied research instead of pure or basic research, which is research that can eventually be used in treatments. One of the main projects that my lab has been working on for several years is the Silicon Kidney Project, which aims to create an artificial mechanical kidney to replace failed kidneys for patients that don’t have access to organ donors. This project is in the pre-clinical phase, which means that it’s being tested on animals before human clinical trials are approved.



Another focus of the Roy lab is the intravascular bioartificial pancreas device, or iBAP, which is an artificial pancreas that aims to treat type 1 (juvenile) diabetes. Most of the approaches to treating T1D include injecting donor pancreas cells (islets) into patients, but the immune system tends to quickly reject the transplant. The bioartificial pancreas device tries to reduce immune rejection by preventing immune cells in the blood from being able to access the transplanted pancreas cells. It does this by inserting a physical barrier between the immune cells and the transplant cells, which is the silicon nanopore membrane (SNM).

Here’s a picture of one of the iBAPs. The version depicted is one of the earlier models. The lab is currently trying to make the device smaller and more ergonomic so that it fits inside of the animal’s (and eventually patients’) body better.




And here are some pictures of an iBAP device after it was used in a live pig study. The device clotted earlier than expected, so it was disassembled for further examination. (warning: blood)




During the next few days, I started working on my independent project, which is going to involve hollow fiber cell scaffolds. Hollow fibers are often used in dialyzers, which are basically just really specific fluid filters. The main problem with filtering blood out through dialyzers and using that to prevent immune rejection is clotting. Blood likes to clot, so much so that it prevents hollow fibers from being a feasible solution to the pancreas immune rejection problem. But hollow fibers are mass-produced and easily obtainable, so it’s still worth trying to implement them.





My project involves taking blood that has already been filtered by the silicon nanopore membrane (aka “ultrafiltrate”), and passing that through the hollow fibers, where the islet cells will be surrounding the fibers. This means that the blood clotting proteins won’t be able to reach the hollow fibers, but the dissolved oxygen and glucose will pass through both the silicon membrane and the hollow fiber to reach the islets, producing insulin. More to come next week!

Comments

  1. Sounds like you are adjusting to lab life well! You've done a great job providing an overview of the lab's work - would love to hear more about what you are doing as you get into it! Quick question - do the silicon nanopore membranes block the proteins from passing through to the hollow fibers? Looking forward to your next post!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Kylie Heering, Week 2 at the Goldstein Lab

We started off our week with a congratulatory acai bowl trip to celebrate Preston’s acceptance into a training grant program. Acai bowls in California top Playa Bowls (no question about it). From what I can tell, its a pretty huge honor to be recognized by this grant, but he’s really humble about it. On Monday, Preston and I decided that testing antibodies that have never been tested on prostate epithelial cells before would be a good objective for my first Western blot on my own. We needed to probe for ASCT2, a glutamine transporter, and GLS in order to determine if their corresponding antibodies are functional. Antibodies are crucial for Western blots because they bind to the protein of interest (POI), allowing for us to qualify its expression after imaging. As such, Preston wanted to make sure they worked by probing for ASCT2 and GLS on three different cell lines. Cell lines are commercially purchased human cells that have been immortalized (modified to grow indefinitely) by telome...

Jaewon Oh - Week 7 and 8

Finally done here with my experience and I wish I had more time keep researching so that I have something a little more "finalised" to present. But I guess that's what past EXP kids meant when they said that 8 weeks of research is not enough and I'll have to work with what I've got. To solve the problem of not having enough data points, we used the online TCGA database for raw data that would be used to calculate mutation rates. Mutation rates were calculated through an R coding script that Dr. Cannataro had made. Because the mutation rates were tumor specific, we had to change the proportions that were obtained from the IARC database using data from another database called cBioPortal. Basically we had to multiply the number of times a certain variant was seen in the IARC database by the percentage of tumors that have a tp53 mutation, because our mutation rates are calculated across all tumors in specific cancers (confusing, I know). After graphing the mutatio...