Skip to main content

May Tran - Weeks 2-3


In the past two weeks, I have begun testing on children at the Bing nursery school. The nursery is a part of the Stanford School of Humanities and Sciences, and was a gift from Dr. Peter S. Bing and his mother, Mrs. Anna Bing Arnold. The children enrolled at the nursery are mostly available as research subjects for the Stanford Psychology Department since their parents have given consent to their participation in research. Despite this, the nursery is extremely nice and has all sorts of activities for the children to partake.

Within the nursery, there are three main classrooms for the children and experimental rooms for the researchers. These experimental rooms are called 'game rooms' because in order to get a child to participate in their research, an experimenter would have to ask them to come to the game room to play with the experimenter's game. Within these game rooms are cameras, microphones, and a one-way mirror, where the children can be observed from an observatory room nearby. The picture below shows my view from the observatory room.


Prior to experimentation, Isabel, another research assistant who is also helping my graduate student, and I were given a script to memorize. Isabel plays the role of the main experimenter, who recruits the children for research and introduces them to toys. I play Kristen, the confederate that will be observing the children fail or succeed. 

For our experiment, we are specifically testing two conditions: the Inaccurate-Fail and Accurate conditions. The procedures are identifical for these conditions and the only difference being whether the confederate will watch the child fail entirely (Inaccurate-Fail) or fail and then succeed (Accurate). We have not tested with the Inaccurate-Success condition, where the confederate watches the child succeed for all of their attempts at the toy.


Toy 1 is a ladybug toy that was made by the lab that would play music when the the child pushes a certain combination of buttons. The music is controlled by the experimenter via a seperate remote during the experiment, making it a fake toy. Toy 2 is the balancing toy that I made (image below).


Our pilot on Tuesday actually didn't go quite according to plan because my balancing toy, which is supposedly unbalanceable without a magnet underneath, stood on its own when the child pushed on it very hard. This was a problem because we only brought one block to the nursery that morning, therefore we could only test with three children - two of which were null because the children succeeded in making the block stand. In the afternoon, we returned and brought another block. This block, on the other hand, was impossible to be balanced on the box. Even with the magnet, I had to place it at a particular spot on the box for it to be successfully balanced. Unfortunately, after a child attempted to make this block stand thirty times, the block broke and wouldn't stand even with the magnet.

We couldn't run back to the lab to get another block because all of the other blocks were also unbalanceable with the magnet, so I had to improvise. What I did was that I would demonstrate to the children that the block was able to stand with the block that stood on its own. Then, I would 'accidentally' drop that block under the table, pick up the block that couldn't stand even with the magnet, and have the child attempt the toy with that block instead, ensuring that they would definitely fail. It was elaborate, but it worked and we were able to experiment with five children, which is a lot more than the three children quota we were given.

On Thursday, unfortunately, the ladybug toy's remote broke and we couldn't get the music to play. Thus, we missed an entire testing day recreating that toy. My job was to spray paint the head of the lady bug, and it was very nice because all I had to do was spray paint this yellow foam ball black and wait for it to dry. So essentially all I did was sit outside and enjoy the weather.



I haven't gotten to coding the videos, yet, because Mika hasn't decided on what to code for. We will definitely do more testings next week, and hopefully nothing malfunctions again. 




Comments

  1. Don't worry about the breaking toys - there is lots of trial and error in research! Read your peers' blogs (especially Michelle and Jane) - everyone is struggling with optimizing some aspect of their project. I look forward to reading about your successes in your next entry!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Evan Bradley, Week 3 at the Missouri Orthopaedic Institute

As mentioned in my previous blog, I have been awaiting ligament, menisci, and cartilage tissue from a canine or human knee joint for (interleukin) IL-1B tissue culture. IL-1B is an inflammatory cytokine that has been proven to increase rates of tissue degeneration and osteoarthritis development in the Thompson Lab. Dr. Stoker wants me to experiment with different types of knee tissues in a co-culture with varying levels of this cytokine to determine its effects on the entire knee joint. This co-culture uses an insert permeable to the media to separate the two tissue samples from physical contact, while allowing them to share the same media. This creates an extremely accurate model for knee tissues in their native environment due to their exposure to the same synovial fluid in the joint. This model would then be treated with the IL-1B and cultured for 21 days. During these 21 days, the media would be collected every three days for biomarker evaluation at the end of the stu...

Kylie Heering, Week 2 at the Goldstein Lab

We started off our week with a congratulatory acai bowl trip to celebrate Preston’s acceptance into a training grant program. Acai bowls in California top Playa Bowls (no question about it). From what I can tell, its a pretty huge honor to be recognized by this grant, but he’s really humble about it. On Monday, Preston and I decided that testing antibodies that have never been tested on prostate epithelial cells before would be a good objective for my first Western blot on my own. We needed to probe for ASCT2, a glutamine transporter, and GLS in order to determine if their corresponding antibodies are functional. Antibodies are crucial for Western blots because they bind to the protein of interest (POI), allowing for us to qualify its expression after imaging. As such, Preston wanted to make sure they worked by probing for ASCT2 and GLS on three different cell lines. Cell lines are commercially purchased human cells that have been immortalized (modified to grow indefinitely) by telome...

Daniel Cheng, In My Own Room

I had no idea that Pennsylvania is this wide. Within the first hour, my train had reached Philly. But to Pittsburgh, it took another seven. Even before I stepped foot into the Search-Based Planning Lab, I was waylaid by some anxious news. The PhD student assigned to be my mentor, Dhruv, texted me that he, Dr. Likhachev, and most of the lab would be out of town for the entire week. So that was that. Fortunately, it was my first week, the week to be spent learning new material, and Dhruv provided me with plenty to digest. I already had ROS (Robot Operating System) installed, so I looked towards the tutorials that ROS provided. I copied commands into my Linux laptop's terminal to run ROS features. I learned the basic structure of ROS: packages, services and clients, publishers and subscribers, messages, nodes, and topics (which nodes communicate messages over). There was one simple yet interesting program I came across in the tutorials called turtlesim, for which using only 2 comm...