Week
2 and 3
My
second week largely involved further familiarizing myself with the lab, its
members, and the cellular analytic work I was tasked with. I continued my work
with the image processing of brain slices to highlight the contrast between
cell bodies and the “background noise” (while maintaining the original pixel
data of image). This was in hopes that we could use some sort of automated way
to count all the cells. Although quantifying the relative intensity of the
pixels of cells was a somewhat viable method to “count” the cells, the ultimate
goal was to actually count the cells.
I
took a stab at counting the cells in one brain slice – 1181 red cells and 381
green cells – definitely not fun and this only motivated me further to find an
alternative method. After some research, I then turned my attention towards a
machine-learning program called Trainable Weka Segmentation. By “training” the
program to identify cells, specifically where they start/end, the program could
possibly segment cells from the background as well as overlapping cells
automatically. Afterwards, the new image could be run under a different program
to count the cells automatically. At first, I tried to run the program on my
laptop, only to realize that 1. It either crashes my laptop or 2. Each training
session takes upwards of 2 hours (and you need several training sessions to
“teach” the program what a cell is). Thankfully, I was able to use one of the
analytic computers in the lab, which dropped the session time to under 10
minutes. This allowed me to play around with the parameters and determine the
best way to “teach” the program to segment the overlapping cell bodies.
Although
by the end of the week, I was pretty
successful at segmenting the cell bodies in each slice, the resulting image was
still not good enough to automatically and correctly count more than 80% of the
cells. L
Meanwhile, my PI
was in contact with another PI who conducts similar research at the National
Institute of Health (NIH). In discussing ways to quantify the cells in the
brain slices, they decided the quickest way would be to send the brain slices
to their lab, and have them do the imaging and processing. Afterwards, they
would send us back the data and images, teach us how to replicate it, and it
would be up to us to familiarize ourselves with their proven method. Their
method involves “processing the slices,
reconstructing a 3D stack, counting the cells, aligning to the allen atlas and
spitting out cell numbers by layer or within a layer”. By creating a 3D
reconstruction, they can align it to an atlas, or an anatomic reference map of
the whole mouse brain. This way, the cells can be binned into regions of
interest in a 3D plane and counted appropriately.
Week
3 consisted of waiting for the slices to be shipped out to the other PI and receiving
the processed slice data. In the meantime, I continued messing around with the
machine learning program and also shadowed my Postdoc in the afternoons. Given
some freetime, I was also able to create 3D reconstructions of the mouse brain
using images consecutive stained brain slices. I used this 3D image along with
the 3D segmentation component of the program. This was somewhat unsuccessful as
it yielded similar results to the original version.
In
the afternoons, I shadowed my postdoc. I learned how to perfuse a mouse, which
involves anaesthetizing a mouse, injecting a solution into it heart, pumping
this solution throughout its circulatory system, and dissecting out the brain.
This process fixes and preserves the brain so that it can be sliced and later
studied. Among other things, I assisted in his mouse behavior tests, and
observed my postdoc prepare brain tissue so that individual cell counts can be
obtained from a Flow Cytometry machine.
Although
I was somewhat unsuccessful, my experience in the lab in the past two weeks has
been very fulfilling. The imaging knowledge I learned should prove to be useful
in my future at the lab. I look forward to my next few weeks!
Comments
Post a Comment