Skip to main content

Amy-Week 2

In the second week, I started to analyze the data collected from the questionnaires distributed to adult participants by putting the scores they rated for different statements to according dimensions, such as Connection Dimension and Physical Coercion Dimension, and calculating Authoritative, Authoritarian and Permissive Parenting Score accordingly. Since parenting styles mainly include authoritative (high discipline and high nurturance), authoritarian (high discipline and low nurturance), permissive (low discipline and high nurturance), and neglectful (low discipline and low nurturance) styles, we were able to categorize the parenting styles of different groups of parent(s) through the calculations by looking at which score was the highest. Then for the rest of the week, I worked on “coding” the behaviors of the participants. Specifically, I first looked at the transcripts that I created and counted the number of times when parents’ teaching and intrusion and children’s compliance and noncompliance were involved. Going further, I played the videotapes, observing participants’ behaviors and listening to, for example, the vocal tones of parents and children. Then I counted the number of times when parents and children showed positive, neutral, and negative affect (feeling/emotion connection) perspectively.

During the second week, I also attended lab meetings of both Empathy Development Lab and Tomasello Lab. For the lab meetings, we listened to the presentations of the Senior Theses Students on their own projects and offered them advice to help them prepare for Duke Vertical Integration Program (VIP), which is something similar to EXP Science Night, in the upcoming week. Moreover, we heard a brief presentation on a new study about whether young children would conform more strictly to the rules they create on their own or those they create with others. After finishing helping with Celia’s project, I will probably participate in these amazing projects as well.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Kylie Heering, Week 2 at the Goldstein Lab

We started off our week with a congratulatory acai bowl trip to celebrate Preston’s acceptance into a training grant program. Acai bowls in California top Playa Bowls (no question about it). From what I can tell, its a pretty huge honor to be recognized by this grant, but he’s really humble about it. On Monday, Preston and I decided that testing antibodies that have never been tested on prostate epithelial cells before would be a good objective for my first Western blot on my own. We needed to probe for ASCT2, a glutamine transporter, and GLS in order to determine if their corresponding antibodies are functional. Antibodies are crucial for Western blots because they bind to the protein of interest (POI), allowing for us to qualify its expression after imaging. As such, Preston wanted to make sure they worked by probing for ASCT2 and GLS on three different cell lines. Cell lines are commercially purchased human cells that have been immortalized (modified to grow indefinitely) by telome...

Alan - First Week at UCSF

Hi Everyone! After arriving in San Francisco last Sunday, I spent this past week settling into the downtown Berkeley apartment that I’ll be sharing with Rohit for the next couple of months, as well as learning my way around the Roy lab at UCSF. First day at the lab was really exciting. Here are a couple pictures of the Mission Bay campus, which was completed just a few years ago. Everything is super new and modern, and there’s still construction for other buildings going on around the campus. Most of the people who work at the Mission Bay campus are either professional researchers or doctors/nurses for the nearby hospital. The graduate students take most of their classes at the original Parnassus campus (where Maya is). I work in Byers Hall, which is connected to Genentech Hall and a short walk down the block from the shuttle stop. There are three other volunteers working for the Roy lab this summer – Kimmai, David, and Pujita, who are all undergrad college students...

Jaewon Oh - Week 7 and 8

Finally done here with my experience and I wish I had more time keep researching so that I have something a little more "finalised" to present. But I guess that's what past EXP kids meant when they said that 8 weeks of research is not enough and I'll have to work with what I've got. To solve the problem of not having enough data points, we used the online TCGA database for raw data that would be used to calculate mutation rates. Mutation rates were calculated through an R coding script that Dr. Cannataro had made. Because the mutation rates were tumor specific, we had to change the proportions that were obtained from the IARC database using data from another database called cBioPortal. Basically we had to multiply the number of times a certain variant was seen in the IARC database by the percentage of tumors that have a tp53 mutation, because our mutation rates are calculated across all tumors in specific cancers (confusing, I know). After graphing the mutatio...