Skip to main content

Jane Richardson; One Down, One To Go...

We finally did it: an optimized IHC protocol. Peering into the microscope to see the bright red below was an amazing feeling. The SERT was glowing like a Christmas tree. Our procedure incorporated two new elements that helped us achieve the finished procedure: pre-heating of the slide and antigen retrieval. Before beginning the slide washes, we heat the slide in a 55o C water bath. This makes the slide more susceptible to the treatments we use. To complete antigen retrieval, we place the slides in .1 M citrate buffer and then heat it, using a 100o C water bath. This exposes epitopes that were covered in the making of the slide. Therefore, the tissue is more susceptible to antigens. With these two new steps, we were finally able to see the SERT, in Cy3, and the background staining, in DAPI. However, one pitfall of our microscope is we can only look at one contrast at a time. This forces us to take separate pictures of each contrast and overlay them in photo editing (picture of infected ileum attached). Though this works, it is not as effective to accurately see the SERT in the tissue. I am still continuing to complete our procedure, but we need to see the slides on a different microscope. We are planning to conduct training with a more complex microscope that would give us a clearer image. This new microscope is also more accurate because it is enclosed so other factors cannot affect the slides, such as air conditioning and moving particles.
Additionally, this Friday, we put our cDNA samples in the qPCR/rt-PCR machine. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (rt-PCR) allows us to analyze how much of the SERT protein was in each tissue sample at the time of cell death. When another copy of the gene is made, the fluorescence in the PCR tube grows a little stronger. When they reach a certain brightness, copying is stopped. This allows you to compare the amount of SERT in each sample. The faster the sample has reached full fluorescence, the more SERT there is in the sample. Our results were very poor. Typically, you are supposed to see a curve in the graph displayed but our results were jagged and staggering. This meant we had yet another protocol to optimize. Though there is more work to be done finalizing this project, it is not my main focus in the lab, so it will likely take longer to complete. Next time we conduct cDNA synthesis, we plan to use a gel to analyze the genetic material and make sure it is not damaged before we make the cDNA.

This week, I brought cupcakes into the lab from Georgetown Cupcakes. Everyone loved them! The people in my lab are so incredible and extremely helpful. They are always willing to answer my questions when I have them and help me with whatever else I need. I have really enjoyed my time in the lab so far and I am looking forward to the other half of my time here!




Comments

  1. Is that your picture??? Beautiful! You should be proud!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Kylie Heering, Week 2 at the Goldstein Lab

We started off our week with a congratulatory acai bowl trip to celebrate Preston’s acceptance into a training grant program. Acai bowls in California top Playa Bowls (no question about it). From what I can tell, its a pretty huge honor to be recognized by this grant, but he’s really humble about it. On Monday, Preston and I decided that testing antibodies that have never been tested on prostate epithelial cells before would be a good objective for my first Western blot on my own. We needed to probe for ASCT2, a glutamine transporter, and GLS in order to determine if their corresponding antibodies are functional. Antibodies are crucial for Western blots because they bind to the protein of interest (POI), allowing for us to qualify its expression after imaging. As such, Preston wanted to make sure they worked by probing for ASCT2 and GLS on three different cell lines. Cell lines are commercially purchased human cells that have been immortalized (modified to grow indefinitely) by telome...

Alan - First Week at UCSF

Hi Everyone! After arriving in San Francisco last Sunday, I spent this past week settling into the downtown Berkeley apartment that I’ll be sharing with Rohit for the next couple of months, as well as learning my way around the Roy lab at UCSF. First day at the lab was really exciting. Here are a couple pictures of the Mission Bay campus, which was completed just a few years ago. Everything is super new and modern, and there’s still construction for other buildings going on around the campus. Most of the people who work at the Mission Bay campus are either professional researchers or doctors/nurses for the nearby hospital. The graduate students take most of their classes at the original Parnassus campus (where Maya is). I work in Byers Hall, which is connected to Genentech Hall and a short walk down the block from the shuttle stop. There are three other volunteers working for the Roy lab this summer – Kimmai, David, and Pujita, who are all undergrad college students...

Jaewon Oh - Week 7 and 8

Finally done here with my experience and I wish I had more time keep researching so that I have something a little more "finalised" to present. But I guess that's what past EXP kids meant when they said that 8 weeks of research is not enough and I'll have to work with what I've got. To solve the problem of not having enough data points, we used the online TCGA database for raw data that would be used to calculate mutation rates. Mutation rates were calculated through an R coding script that Dr. Cannataro had made. Because the mutation rates were tumor specific, we had to change the proportions that were obtained from the IARC database using data from another database called cBioPortal. Basically we had to multiply the number of times a certain variant was seen in the IARC database by the percentage of tumors that have a tp53 mutation, because our mutation rates are calculated across all tumors in specific cancers (confusing, I know). After graphing the mutatio...