Skip to main content

Rohit, Week 5: Automated Vehicle Symposium

From June 9th to 12th I had the opportunity to attend the international automated vehicle symposium in San Francisco. The symposium was three days long and consisted of a morning session and afternoon small group discussions, in the mornings various professionals in the field of autonomous driving presented their research and goals going forward for autonomous driving research and development. For example the VP of self-driving vehicles, Nadeem Sheikh, gave a talk about the companies goal to eventually transition to becoming fully autonomous. An interesting point he brought up was that even if lyft becomes fully autonomous there are other problems that would arise, for example currently lyft drivers maintain their own vehicles and store them overnight. Another issue that was discussed involved city planning, because if a city only has fully autonomous vehicles there would be no need for parking as the vehicle could roam around while their owner shopped and then pick them up again. This would radically change city design and planning especially in cities where parking is a premium. Another interesting presentation was from the the program manager, Dr. Ismail Zohdy from Dubai's self-driving transport program. Like many other countries Dubai is offering to help companies that want to create and test autonomous vehicles on Dubai's roads both with financial aid and permits to test vehicles publicly. The following picture is the main hall where the morning sessions would be held.
 The next image is from a smaller breakout session where there was a debate as to which standard of communication should be adoped between two autonomous vehicles.
Lastly another interesting aspect of self driving vehicles were the different levels of autonomy. Level 1 consists of basic cruise control, Level 2 consists of adaptive cruise control often found in most modern vehicle where the car can automatically adjust the following distance but cannot steer. Level 3 can both steer and adjust following distance, but always requires a human to be aware of vehicles motions, this is similar to Tesla's autopilot system. Level 4 is basically fully driver less but is restricted to areas that have been thoroughly; mapped out and driven before, this is similar to Google's self driving program: Waymo's vehicles. Lastly level 5 is full autonomy and there is no human input or location restriction at all. One of the representatives from Waymo highlighted a key issue they had to overcome in regards to what level they were going to develop initially they worked there way up to level three over the course of a decade but soon found themselves stuck because the human driver would become too reliant on the system and not pay attention. Therefore they decided to develop a level 4 vehicles to remove the potential human factor out of the equation. This has so far been successful as there has not been a single crash caused by a Waymo vehicle. Overall the symposium was helped me learn about the recent developments in the field of autonomous vehicles. The only off putting aspect was that the other high school intern and I were the only high school students that attended the symposium. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Evan Bradley, Week 3 at the Missouri Orthopaedic Institute

As mentioned in my previous blog, I have been awaiting ligament, menisci, and cartilage tissue from a canine or human knee joint for (interleukin) IL-1B tissue culture. IL-1B is an inflammatory cytokine that has been proven to increase rates of tissue degeneration and osteoarthritis development in the Thompson Lab. Dr. Stoker wants me to experiment with different types of knee tissues in a co-culture with varying levels of this cytokine to determine its effects on the entire knee joint. This co-culture uses an insert permeable to the media to separate the two tissue samples from physical contact, while allowing them to share the same media. This creates an extremely accurate model for knee tissues in their native environment due to their exposure to the same synovial fluid in the joint. This model would then be treated with the IL-1B and cultured for 21 days. During these 21 days, the media would be collected every three days for biomarker evaluation at the end of the stu...

Kylie Heering, Week 2 at the Goldstein Lab

We started off our week with a congratulatory acai bowl trip to celebrate Preston’s acceptance into a training grant program. Acai bowls in California top Playa Bowls (no question about it). From what I can tell, its a pretty huge honor to be recognized by this grant, but he’s really humble about it. On Monday, Preston and I decided that testing antibodies that have never been tested on prostate epithelial cells before would be a good objective for my first Western blot on my own. We needed to probe for ASCT2, a glutamine transporter, and GLS in order to determine if their corresponding antibodies are functional. Antibodies are crucial for Western blots because they bind to the protein of interest (POI), allowing for us to qualify its expression after imaging. As such, Preston wanted to make sure they worked by probing for ASCT2 and GLS on three different cell lines. Cell lines are commercially purchased human cells that have been immortalized (modified to grow indefinitely) by telome...

Daniel Cheng, In My Own Room

I had no idea that Pennsylvania is this wide. Within the first hour, my train had reached Philly. But to Pittsburgh, it took another seven. Even before I stepped foot into the Search-Based Planning Lab, I was waylaid by some anxious news. The PhD student assigned to be my mentor, Dhruv, texted me that he, Dr. Likhachev, and most of the lab would be out of town for the entire week. So that was that. Fortunately, it was my first week, the week to be spent learning new material, and Dhruv provided me with plenty to digest. I already had ROS (Robot Operating System) installed, so I looked towards the tutorials that ROS provided. I copied commands into my Linux laptop's terminal to run ROS features. I learned the basic structure of ROS: packages, services and clients, publishers and subscribers, messages, nodes, and topics (which nodes communicate messages over). There was one simple yet interesting program I came across in the tutorials called turtlesim, for which using only 2 comm...